English | Español

Orthopedic surgery

Radiation Protection in Orthopaedics

Orthopaedics Radiation Protection

Orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly using X ray based fluoroscopic techniques in the operation theatre or in the fluoroscopy room. Procedures such as kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, deformity correction, pelvic fixation, intramedullary inter-locking nails and CT guided biopsies require radiation exposure. The overall use of radiation in procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons is not as much as that used by interventional cardiologists. However, the lack of training in radiation protection among orthopaedic surgeons remains a problem.



Patient protection

Staff protection

1. Can there be significant radiation effects to a patient undergoing fluoroscopic procedures?

No. The radiation doses delivered to patients in most orthopaedic procedures under normal conditions will not cause effects such as skin injury, infertility and cataract [deterministic effect]. The typical skin dose in most uro-radiological procedures is less than 1 Gy whereas the threshold for erythema is 2 Gy. However, carcinogenic and genetic effects [stochastic effects] cannot be ruled out, although the probability of such effects can be minimized and is usually small. The typical radiation dose values in terms of dose area product (DAP) are mostly in the range of 0.02 to 20 Gy.cm2. At this level of radiation exposure, probability of radiation effects is much smaller than the benefits that usually occur.

Page Top

2. Which factors can affect patient dose in spine or orthopaedic imaging procedures?

There are patient dependent, equipment dependent and procedure dependent factors.

Patient dependent factors include: body mass or body thickness in the beam, complexity of the lesion and anatomic target structure, previous radiation exposure, radiosensitivity of some patients.

Equipment dependent factors include: Setting of dose rates in pulsed fluoro- and continuous fluoro mode, appropriate quality control, last image hold, acquisition, and virtual collimation.

The main procedure related factors are: number of radiographic frames per run, collimation, fluoroscopic and radiographic acquisition modes, fluoroscopy time, wedge filter, magnification, distance of patient to image receptor (image intensifier or flat panel detector), distance between X ray tube and patient, and tube angulations.

Read more »

Page Top

3. How can I manage patient dose?

By keeping the X ray tube as far away from the patient as feasible, keeping the image receptor as close to the patient as possible, keeping the foot on the pedal only when essential, reducing the number of images acquired (runs), using the navigation system, collimating the X ray beam, using last image hold, using pulsed fluoroscopy, minimal use of magnification reducing exposure to radiosensitive organs such as the breast and reducing oblique views.

Page Top

4. What adverse effects could happen as a result of dose reduction actions?

Optimization of protection requires that exposure of patients be the minimum necessary to achieve the required diagnostic and therapeutic objective of the interventional procedure [BSS]. By no means should dose reduction compromise clinical information and outcome. In diagnosis, if the dose is reduced below the minimum necessary, the adverse effects may result in reduced quality and extent of information.

Page Top

Staff protection

Almost all of the measures to reduce patient dose will also result in a reduction of staff dose.

Read more »

5. How much radiation is safe for me?

There are radiation dose limits for staff recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) that most countries tend to adopt. Currently the level is 20 mSv/year (actually 100 mSv in 5 years - not to exceed 50 mSv in any one year). This dose limit is based on the calculation of radiation risk over a full working life from the age of 18 years to 65 years (47 years) at the rate of 20 mSv per year, amounting to 20x47= 0.94 Sv and resulting in an excess cancer risk of 1 in 1000. Most orthopaedic surgeons using radiation protection devices and tools will have a radiation dose below typically 2 mSv/year.

Table 1. Approximate dose to the surgeon per procedure (µSv) with 0.5 mm lead apron worn*

Procedure Dose to the Surgeon per procedure (µSv) Screening Time
Hip 5 25 sec/patient
Spine 21 2 min/patient
Kyphoplasty 250 10 min/patient

*Occupational exposure from common fluoroscopic projections used in orthopedic Surgery [TH].

Page Top

6. Is the dose to orthopaedic surgeons much higher than other interventionalists?

No. The radiation dose to orthopaedic and trauma surgeons in most routine procedures is much smaller than those performing cardiac interventions.

Page Top

7. Is there a risk of cataract after several years of work in an orthopaedic operating room?

Very unlikely. Proper use of radiation protection tools and techniques can prevent deterministic effects such as cataract and can avoid any significant increase in probability of cancer risk for many years to cover the full professional life. To date, there have been no reports of radiation induced cataract among orthopaedic surgeons, however such reports do exist for interventional radiologists and cardiologists [VA; CI; VA1].

For further information.

Page Top

8. Can I work my full professional life with radiation in the operating room and have no radiation effects?

Yes it is possible. Under optimized conditions when

  • the equipment is periodically tested and it is operating properly,
  • personal protective devices (lead apron of suitable lead equivalence of 0.25 to 0.5 mm and wrap around type, protective eye wear or protective shields are used for the head/face and leg regions),
  • use of personnel monitoring devices is implemented to estimate radiation exposure,
  • proper techniques are employed as in Question 3 above.

It is possible to achieve a smaller risk of radiation effects for a full professional life using the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle. There are situations where protection of patients poses a great challenge, but this is not so much the case for staff, where protection can be reasonably achieved.

Page Top

9. What are the typical radiation doses associated with orthopaedic procedures?

Typical values in terms of effective doses are presented in Table 2 below

Table 2. Mean effective doses from Orthopaedic procedures

Procedure Mean effective dose (mSv) Equivalent number of PA chest radiographs (each 0.02 mSv)
Other extremities [ME] 0.001 0.05
Knee [ME] 0.005 0.25
Shoulder [ME] 0.01 0.5
Sternum [HA] 0.01 0.5
TM joint [HA] 0.012 0.6
Skull [ME] 0.1 5
Arthrography [HA] 0.17 8.5
Cervical Spine [ME] 0.2 10
Lumbosacral joint [HA] 0.34 17
Upper extremity angiography [BO] 0.56 28
Pelvis [ME] 0.6 30
Hip [ME] 0.7 35
Thoracic Spine [ME] 1 50
Lumbar Spine [ME] 1.5 75
Myelography [HA] 2.46 123
Lower extremity angiography [BO] 3.5 175
Thoracic aortography [HA] 4.1 205
Peripheral arteriography [HA] 7.1 355

Typical radiation doses from fluoroscopy procedures

Page Top

References



Social Media

Related Links

Poster

 
Copyright © 2013 International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria